9/11 anniversary - afterthoughts
My comments on the 9/11 anniversary brought in a flood of protests,
and positive support. I'm not sure why I invite dissent. On the other
hand, it IS worthwhile, for some of the jewels of understanding.
A LOT of people DID take the time to share their views. I sincerely
appreciate their sincerity and willingness! Thank you!
Half of America supports President Bush, and I didn't mean to demean
their support. Indeed one person felt that "George W. Bush is one
of the finest President's of recent times." In the light of recent
events, I don't understand that kind of support. It's interesting
how the "facts" mean different things to different people.
I suppose that's what makes democracy so powerful.
I really, really don't understand those who use the word "liberal"
as a pejorative. I saw an interview with General Wesley Clark, who
has just entered the Presidential race. He was asked if he was a
liberal. And he said yes, he was, and that he did not think liberal
was a bad word. He said America is a liberal democracy that offers
its citizens the right to have different opinions, to discuss their
differences openly. That is how he defined "liberal". I like it!
The words liberal and conservative need to be re-assessed. They
are both positive, and should not be thought of as conflicting.
The media has taken these words and redefined them, assigning
negative connotations. They make money by inflaming the arguments,
polarizing the positions, increasing the drama to increase ratings.
I benefit much from hearing views that do not line up with my own.
Especially when the other opinions have merit. I grow by thinking
about new and different points of view. Your strong feelings and
opinions about the Iraq war are the part of this "liberal" nation
that makes me proud. What I like most is the opinions that are
expressed sincerely, not just emotional rantings.
Thank you to all those who, even with strong emotions, explained
their position sensibly and intelligently, giving thoughtful
expression to their views. We all grow from that kind of sharing!
Dictionary & Thesaurus comparisons
of 'Conservative' and 'Liberal':
Conservative vs. Liberal morphs into Good vs. Evil
Visualize a Fair Election in 2004
Return to the TOP
Media download roadblocks won't stop the flood
The music industry snuffed out Napster with a legal barrage two years
ago. But users promptly shifted to downloading from peer-to-peer P2P
sites such as KaZaA and Morpheus, which generated even more traffic.
This piracy has hit CD sales, expected to fall by 5-8% this year,
after an 8% drop in 2002.
Many people think that the record labels profit too much, with too
little money filtering down to the musicians and songsters. Others
think it is a rip-off to buy an expensive CD with several songs on
it, when all they want is one key item. And most people want to have
their own, custom selection of songs on one disc. Meanwhile, the
downloading traffic continues.
In an effort to limit this seemingly inexorable growth of
file-sharing, the Recording Industry Association of America has
launched a big publicity campaign about its plans to sue anyone
who continues this "illegal" practice. Now they are collecting
"examples" to back up the threats. They have filed 261 lawsuits
against individual downloaders. Will this radical strategy work?
And is it fair? The "public" is still divided.
Even in the face of the threatened lawsuits, file-swappers are
moving quickly to videos, downloading some 500,000 movies a day.
Hollywood seems scared! Their lobbyists are pressing for stringent
laws that would wrap their products in enough legal and technical
barriers to make them unappealing.
Will the legal efforts actually turn the tide against file sharing?
After the RIAA announced its intention to sue consumers, activity
indeed dipped this summer. Last week a Newsweek poll found that 54%
of the respondents say the crackdown will make them less likely to
continue. The traffic declined. But the decline may have been only
temporary, because of the summer holidays. After Labor Day there
was a dramatic uptick again, and the numbers were as high as ever.
And there was no significant drop-off after news of the lawsuits
last week.
For digital entertainment to flourish, there will have to be
innovative protection which satisfy downloaders, making it tough
to download a protected copy, and cheap enough to buy a legal
version, without making it inflexible and difficult to use.
Apple's iTunes, which started in April 2003, gives customers much
of the freedom and selection they want. It lets them buy songs for
99 cents each, and copy them to as many as three other computers
or music players. Now Shawn Fanning, Napster founder, is proposing
another solution: a music clearinghouse that will automatically
check copyrights on a song and charge a user for it.
These are steps in the right direction. The key is for Hollywood
to hammer out agreements on building sophisticated yet flexible
copy protection into the next generation of digital TVs, cable
boxes, and personal video recorders.
Will the lawsuits and advertising campaigns - the FUDS (fear,
uncertainty, doubt) - stop "illegal" file swapping? In my opinion,
not likely. This is a worldwide phenomenon, like a flood which
cannot be stopped by "local" legalities. The solution MUST come
from copyright protection that cannot be broken.
And that's a tall order!
Record Industry Sues Music File Swappers
Newsweek (22 Sept. 03) - Courthouse Rock
CNN/Money: The Kaaza conundrum
Return to the TOP
The Google "pecking order"
If you're hooked on Google (who is NOT?) then you are used to the
speed and accuracy of a Google search. How exactly does Google manage
to find the right results for every query as quickly as it does?
The heart of Google's search technology is PigeonRank™, a system for
ranking web pages developed by Google founders Larry Page and Sergey
Brin at Stanford University.
The basic idea comes from the curious fact that the common gray
pigeon can easily distinguish among items displaying only the
tiniest differences. Google mimics this ability that enables it
to select relevant web sites from among thousands of similar pages.
When a search query is submitted to Google, it is routed to a data
coop where monitors flash result pages at blazing speeds. When a
relevant result is observed by one of the "pigeons" in the cluster,
it assigns the page a PigeonRank "peck" of one. Those pages receiving
the most "pecks", are returned at the top of the user's results page
with the other results displayed in "pecking order".
Yes, I know this sounds strange. But, it makes sense in a reverse
complexity, chaos-theory sort of way.
Read: The technology behind Google's great results
Useful booklet: Google Pocket Guide
Return to the TOP