JimPinto.com - Connections for Growth & Success
No. 113 : March 6, 2003
Keeping an eye on technology futures.
Business commentary - no hidden agendas.
New attitudes, no platitudes.
Contents:
- Waiting, one hand behind
- The Mid-East & terrorism
- Lessons from the Great Depression
- Invensys' precarious perch - piecemeal purchase possible
- ABB record loss - but the worst is over
- eFeedback:
- Frustration over the impending war
- Political labels
- Depression backlash against globalization
Waiting, one hand behind
I've had a lot of good feedback and some pressure regarding my views
on the impending war in Iraq. Some people think I should not confuse
automation and futures news with political opinions, or at least put
the editorials at the end.
My response (again) is that I would feel rather shallow if I wrote
about other stuff, without addressing the primary concern in the
world today. So, if you'd like to read about the latest status of
Invensys or ABB, please simply scroll down.
Anna Quindlen is a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and best-selling
novelist whose column appears every other week on the back page of
Newsweek. In the latest issue of Newsweek (March 10, 2003), she
expresses very well many people's feelings, and mine, about the
current situation. Please read - I'd value your personal comments.
Newsweek: Anna Quindlen - Waiting, one hand behind
The Middle-east and terrorism
On Sept. 23 2002 in Lincoln, Nebraska, Thomas L. Friedman, NY Times
columnist and 3-times Pulitzer prize winner, gave the 7th annual
Governor's lecture in the humanities; his subject: "The Middle East
and US Foreign Policy". My friend Perry Marshall sent this with the
comment, "It's one of the most astute discussions I've ever read
about the chasm between the West and the disenfranchised East."
I have done my best to summarize the talk here. I hope it will
stimulate you to read the complete speech online.
It is clear that we must rid the world of terrorists - but more
importantly, we have to kill their ideas. We need to understand that
terrorism is not about the poverty of money. It's about people feeling
humiliated, feeling a poverty of dignity as they compare themselves
to the West. That is the rage that caused 9/11.
In the past, we have treated Saudi Arabia as if it were just a big,
dumb gas station. All we cared about was that when we drove up, the
pump was open and the price was low. Today, we must discover why it
is incubating terrorism more than any other country.
The 9/11 hijackers were from two groups - Saudis and Europeans.
The Saudis were the followers - to them it was simply some sort of
martyrdom. They were typical of young men all over Saudi Arabia and
the Middle East today. Oil resources have increased the standard
of living, but there is high unemployment and an army of young people
with a lot of resentment. They go to the mosque and the preachers
there fill their heads with ideas that all their problems as caused by
America, or Israel, or the West. That is the pool of people from which
Al Quaeda draws.
Then there is the second group of 9/11 hijackers - the 'Europeans', Saudis
and Mid-East born, but moved to Europe. These were the key terrorism plotters.
Not one of these young men left home a Muslim radical - they were radicalized
in their encounters with the West, particularly with Europe, where a spark
of rage got ignited.
In the US, we aspire to be a melting pot; it is a part of our
self-identity. That is not true of Europe, which is culturally mostly
Christian. There are mosques in all European countries; but European
Muslims, even to the third generation, really don't feel welcome in
the local societies. So the young men who come from the urban Muslim
world feel estranged and they gather in mosques for solidarity.
Some drift into more radical circles, and some clearly drifted all
the way to Al Quaeda. These are the angry, educated killers.
Friedman goes on to outline how religion plays an important part in
the development of feelings of disrespect and rage. In the West, clear
separation between Church and State has developed over past centuries.
In contrast, the Mid-East (Saudi Arabia is the prime example) has
autocratic, nondemocratic regimes that get legitimacy through striking
deals with the anti-modernist religious leaders. The non-democratic
regime is "blessed" by the clergy in return for official sanctions
and funding. The anti-modernist religious educators produce a young
generation of people unprepared to succeed in the modern world.
That reinforces the poverty, the poverty reinforces the autocracy,
the autocracy reinforces the religious affairs and education, which
reinforces anti-modernism, which reinforces the unprepared youth,
and the wheel of Al Quaeda type terrorism just goes around and
around. This is the cycle that must first be broken for terrorism
to be defused.
Archived video of Friedman's speech
Lessons from The Great Depression
The US stock markets greeted 2003 with a healthy jump. But alas,
that didn't last and the economy reflects continued uncertainty.
During 2002, the S&P 500 index dipped by 22.1%, completing a third
consecutive year of negative returns (-9.1% in 2000, -11.9% in 2001).
If the S&P also dips in 2003, for four consecutive years, this will
be the first time since "The Great Depression" - the last great
deflationary event in America (1929, 30, 31 and 32).
The 9/11 attacks and the subsequent fear of terrorism have deepened
the parallels between present-day America and the America of the
1920's. In the early 20's, Americans also felt assaulted by alien
forces - radicalism and Bolshevism imported mainly by immigrants.
There was fear of terrorism then, too. These are eerie extensions
of similarities between the two periods.
In both periods, Americans enjoyed astonishing prosperity. In both,
novel technologies generated a boom. In both, there was faith that
the economic system had permanently changed things for the better.
In both, the stock market rose to unanticipated heights before it
crashed. The SEC itself was formed in response to the market-crash
of 1929, and the new, stiffened post-Enron rules are still playing
out. We know what happened to the 20's - the depression lasted
10 years; the 90's endgame is still unfolding.
In the 20's new technologies helped propel the pre-depression boom.
The spread of electricity stimulated markets for new appliances:
irons, toasters, stoves, washers, vacuum cleaners and radios. Along
with the spread of movies, radio's arrival fostered a new national
pop culture and politics. Even more transforming were automobiles
- from 1920 to 1929, car registrations tripled. The hunger for
mobility spurred feeder industries, from filling stations to road
construction to motels. Mutual funds, then known as investment
trusts, were booming. Stock market setbacks were temporary; people
bought on the dips, and warnings about speculative excesses were
dismissed as old-fashioned. Sound familiar?
The Great Depression caused enormous hardship for tens of millions
of people and the failure of a large fraction of the nation's banks,
businesses and farms. It transformed national politics by vastly
expanding government, which was increasingly expected to stabilize
the economy and to prevent suffering. Social Security, unemployment
insurance, and federal family assistance all began in the thirties.
At its nadir, the Depression was collective insanity. Workers were
idle because firms would not hire them to work their machines;
firms would not hire workers to work machines because they saw
no market for goods; and there was no market for goods because
workers had no incomes to spend.
In the US today, globalization is causing job-shifts to lower-cost
countries and major domestic upheavals. In 2002, China's foreign
trade increased an amazing 21% when that of most others declined.
There is no question that China is exporting deflation to the rest
of the world. The Great Depression and political upheaval in the
1930s destroyed the last great age of globalism. Today, whether
globalism continues unchecked remains to be seen.
Thinkaboutit...
NY Times - Two books seek lessons from the great depression
Invensys' precarious perch
Invensys shares closed at 12½p on Feb. 25 03, against 52p at the
start of the month. A mooted break-up valuation of nearly 3 times
its fallen share price halted the steep slide. Curiously, Invensys
was among the biggest FTSE risers when it jumped back to 16p.
I got lots of chuckles on my previous comment that "the Lord may
soon lose both his FTSEs." As we went to ePress (Wed. 5 March 03)
shares closed at 13.25p, with market-cap of £464M.
Credit Suisse First Boston valued the production management business
at £810 million, and suggested that GE and Siemens would be interested
in picking up the process controls pieces. CSFB valued the energy
management business at £2 billion and felt that private equity players
such as KKR could spin it off. And CSFB thought (correctly in my
opinion) that Schneider could be interested in power-systems.
Hard to believe that Invensys, formerly BTR and Siebe, was the
second largest company in Britain just a few years ago. After
being overstretched by former CEO Allen Yurko, it seems ready to
be dismantled. Now the battle is against time as the bank covenants
could be breached soon and investors are fretting about asbestos
related liabilities. Faced with an estimated £600M hole in the
pension fund, there is also pressure to end or modify the pension
scheme. Analysts, customers, vendors and employees are wondering
how long Invensys can survive intact.
With economic recovery unlikely, shareholders recognize that
Haythornthwaite's "plan" will inevitably give way to a fire sale
initiated by the banks. Meanwhile, Haythornthwaite and his horde of
hangers-on continue to operate bravely. Loyal employees worry that
inexperienced managers continue to be hired, stretching budgets and
learning curves beyond credibility.
One long-term employee reports on the weblog: "I work with one new
manager who seems to have no more experience than reading the GE
manual on 'How to be like Jack', 'How to forget customers' and
'How to punish winners by treating them like losers'. He has coined
the new phrase 'If it's working change it'. When he exits the company
(soon, I hope) he will still be humming 'We are INVENSYBLE' (to the
tune of 'We Are The Champions') and carry away a big check."
Pinto's Prognostications:
Haythornthwaite and his minions are fighting a losing battle. While
the big segments (Foxboro, APV, Wonderware) can be sold off to the
likes of Siemens and GE, several smaller companies (Eurotherm is a
prime example, with totally ineffective management) will simply be
dangling in the wind, to be used by Invensys as pawns in the process.
My advice to key managers in strong, independent companies such as
Triconex: Get your management group together and attempt a leveraged
buyout. You can get bank financing based on independent cash-flow,
plus strong venture capital that would be willing to support a good
management team.
Break-up hopes help Invensys to halt slide
Invensys may scrap pension scheme
The latest news and comments on the Invensys weblog
ABB posts record loss - but the worst is over
ABB Ltd. posted a record $787M loss for 2002, including provisions
for asbestos claims and asset disposals. This exceeded the previous
record loss of $691M for 2001. ABB subsidiary Combustion Engineering
recently filed for bankruptcy after the asbestos lawsuits were settled
for $1.2B.
ABB's revenue declined 6% to $18.30B in 2002, from $19.38B in 2001.
Operating profit rose to $336M from $179M in 2001, meeting Dormann's
key goal to have better operating margins. Dormann said the company
is confident about reaching its 4% revenue growth target for 2003
and that operating profit could improve to 4%.
ABB reported that results improved in its power technologies and
automation technologies businesses, the core divisions. Despite a
difficult market, full-year automation orders increased 5% to $8.70B
and fell 8% in power to $6.84B.
ABB is in talks with several bidders for the sale of the oil, gas and
petrochemicals division and expects to book a gain on the sale. Debt
is expected to reduce from $8B to $6.5B by the end of this year.
With its market capitalization at just $3.5B, ABB looks like a
takeover target and CEO Joergen Dormann warned that it might fall
prey to a bid; he didn't say whether he'd consider such a move
hostile or friendly. Given the current low ebb in the power and
automation industry, ABB is not a good target. The current low
price has a big risk attached and ABB will probably be left to
solve its troubles on its own.
On the ABB weblog, an ex-employee commented: "I like ABB and hope to
perhaps return one day. ABB needs to get back to its roots (as Dormann
is doing) to think intelligently, not knee jerk. Shareholders' views
have had an enormous effect on ABB strategy and response recently.
They have not reacted well to this in the past. I hope they will
continue to listen. I have just bought some shares in ABB."
ABB Posts Record $787M Loss for 2002
Latest comments and feedback on ABB weblog
eFeedback
Patrick K. Gladd [Pat.K.Gladd@conocophillips.com] expressed the
mixture of frustration and exasperation that we all feel about
Iraq and the impending war:
"What is the answer on how to deal with a leader who uses biological
weapons on his own people, allows his elite guard to rape Iraqi women,
allows his son to be in charge of the Olympic athletes of Iraq and
when they don't perform they end up in prison for life, or are shot?
"War is ugly, war is a last resort but sometimes it is justified.
It makes us realize that there are people out there that would do
anything to get what they want, at any human cost.
"We are all cut from different pieces of cloth, so we can respectfully
disagree. Even so, I would die for you in battle because you are my
brother as an American citizen, from the not-so-perfect but
the-best-we-can-make it, greatest country in the world.
"To a point, our differences are what makes this country great. Must
we debate to death while the Trojan horse is planted on our soil as it
was on 9/11? I don't mean to go back to the days of McCarthy, not by a
long shot. I just want to get back to life as it was before 9/11, when
one could get on a plane and the only worry was when the peanuts would
be served...."
On the subject of political labels, Tom Collen [tomcollen@attbi.com]
commented:
"It is not surprising to me, after years and years of screaming by
right-wing windbags like Rush Limbaugh and others of his ilk, that
so many people have been trained or conditioned to simplify their
thinking down to the labeling that is so prevalent now. I remember
too, when a liberal was not the evil beast that many seem too think
they are now. Liberals are now so demonized and pigeonholed, that
many "good" ones have gone into hiding. Look at the Democratic Party.
The only way this dangerous trend can be reversed is to keep speaking
out and exercising your right to do so."
Christopher Schene [karate_dad@hotmail.com] triggered my own thinking
on the many parallels between the Great Depression and current
political and economic conditions:
"This time period in history shows many disturbing parallels to the
time just before the 30's depression. I expect an upheaval and revolt
at the ballot box when western workers realize they have been sold
down the road. Roughly, I would expect this to crystallize in a major
way around the 2007 - 2009 time frame. The 30's revolt at the ballot
box ushered in a socialistic backlash in the US and the democrats
controlled the house and senate for two generations after that.
I expect that you will see much of the corporate power taken back
and for the US to become more isolationist.
"I also would expect to an upheaval in China around the same time.
The country is changing too fast for the economic and societal
structure to absorb it without some sort of conflict related to
the growing pains. The problem with educating people is they will
become too smart to accept the oppression that China is known for.
Look for a China revolution circa 2009."
JimPinto.com eNews - on the web
If you've missed a couple of issues of eNews, or wish to refer to earlier items,
please note : You can see ALL past issues online at :
Index of ALL past JimPinto.com eNews
eSpeak to me
If smell something fishy in your pond, please e-let me know and I'll check it out.
Please send your tips and alerts, your news, views and stews. I'd like to e-hear from you.
If you have comments or suggestions for Growth & Success News, please contact me directly at :
Jim@JimPinto.com
Subscribe or Unsubscribe
If you got this eNews through someone else, you might like to subscribe for a regular free copy,
direct to your own email. Just click your mouse on :
Or, if you're lazy (you may miss some privileges) simply send a blank email message to :
Sign-up@JimPinto.com with subject line :
"sign me up for JimPinto.com E-mail news".
To be removed send a blank email message to
eRemove@JimPinto.com with subject line "Remove".
Stay in e-touch!
Cheers:
|