Problematic paradoxes
Our country is now beset with grave political and social dilemmas.
The frenzied media keep spinning out some version or other of the
news, as events unfold like some terrible tornado in slow motion.
And in response, these words just click out of my keyboard.
I can't proceed here with less weighty, more ordinary stuff when
my mind keeps pulling me back to the paradoxical problems facing
all of us. Please, bear with me.
America, a peace-loving democracy, is now feared by most of the
world as war-mongering. Our troops are said to be defending freedom,
after we started a war half a world away. In his State of the Union
address on Jan. 28, President Bush cited stunning evidence suggesting
a nuclear threat, evidence which we now learn had been forged. Colin
Powell refused to include this discredited statement in his address
to the UN on Feb. 5, only one week later.
We were told many times that the enemy was armed with WMDs, but
not one has yet been found. The rhetoric abruptly changed, that
there were "programs" for WMDs. Our aim was liberation, for people
who now consider us an alien occupying force. We are told the war
was over, yet our soldiers continue to die daily. Mr. Bush's
response? Macho madness: "I say, bring 'em on!" Try explaining
that to the families of the casualties.
Here is something I cannot understand - in March polls reported
that the number of Americans who believed that Saddam Hussein was
"behind 9/11" (what the Administration had endlessly been implying)
had increased from 4% to 56%. We went to war to rid Iraq of the evil
dictator, but he still lives in spite of a $25M reward on his head.
The watching world is aware that the reward merely demonstrates our
own money-motivation, but yields no informers. And Osama bin Laden.
Remember him? With that same price on his head, this seemingly
forgotten arch-terrorist still remains at large.
Here at home, the economy is limping and unemployment is at the
highest level in a decade, bringing respectable middle-class
breadwinners to the breadlines. And our government continues
to spend an estimated $1 B per week on the Iraqi war, more than
double the original estimates. In 2003, military spending on Iraq
will cost the equivalent of the combined budgets for NASA, all US
foreign aid, all pollution control, the FBI, the National Cancer
Institute, and all US national parks. Military commanders tell us
that we will be in Iraq "for a long time". Sizable troop support
from other nations is not forthcoming, and Mr. Bush cannot bring
himself to ask NATO or the UN for the help we need.
The Congress is now investigating the reasons given to the Congress
and to the American people for the war on Iraq, and how a falsehood
came to be included in the State of the Union address. They will soon
be telling Americans things which many Americans don't want to hear.
Clearly there were others who reviewed and approved the speech, but
the President is the one who made it. Now we wait to see if they
find a better fall-guy than CIA Chief Tenet (who tried to take the
blame) or whether Mr. Bush can again just brazen it out, shrugging
off his blatant misstatement with juvenile bravado. The press
secretary announced, "the President has moved on". Yes, but have we?
We must wait, then, and watch how many more mis-judgments, mistakes
and mis-steps accumulate before voter reaction erupts.
TIME magazine (July 13, 2003) - A Question Of Trust
Washington Post: Boiling Mad Over Bush
Myths and misconceptions about the war in Iraq
Return to the TOP