Automation news & views
The JimPinto.com weblogs continue to be a significant traffic
generator for news and views related to all the major automation
companies. This indicates a communications gap between top and
mid-levels of management. Why do most employees feel that they
cannot talk directly to their own managers? Most weblogs are
anonymous; but in any case, we do not publish names unless
specifically agreed.
Automation magazines typically publish company press releases,
with no critical commentary - perhaps fearful of losing advertisers.
National financial newspapers carry bold and sometimes adversarial
news articles; indeed that's how I get much of my news. But, the two
worlds don't seem to touch, and JimPinto.com is often the conduit.
I'm uncomfortable about the weblogs carrying only negative views.
But even though I have repeatedly invited positive feedback, we get
very little, and the rebuttals come quickly. So, we'll continue to
be a mirror of what's happening out there, no more, no less.
Here are my latest news & views, at the start of the New Year:
Rockwell:
My commentary (eNews 30 Dec. 2003) on what will happen to Rockwell
now that Keith Nosbusch is CEO, got a lot of positive feedback. One
European "insider" responded with a fairly detailed rebuttal in the
Rockwell weblog (Tuesday, January 6, 2004). It's interesting to note
that this employee chose to write to Keith Nosbusch through the
JimPinto.com weblog, rather than speak or write to him directly.
Hey! My prediction that Rockwell will be acquired this year (2004)
still stands.
Honeywell:
Kevin Gilligan, head of the $7 billion Automation and Control
Solutions (ACS) business has "resigned to pursue leadership
opportunities outside" - which means he was ejected. Most people agree
that Gilligan (a legacy from the old Honeywell "Red") is mostly BS,
and his lack of results became evident to hard-nosed CEO Dave Cote.
Roger Fradin is now ACS President and CEO.
Honeywell Industry Solutions, now called Process Solutions to better
reflect its market sphere, was downgraded to become part of ACS with
the troubled departure of previous CEOs. But, new CEO Jack Bolick is
a good man and has generated good results; perhaps he will soon be
reporting directly to the top, rather than through ACS and Fradin.
I still predict that a significant event (buy or sell) will occur
with Honeywell PS this year. Siemens is still hovering around,
looking for deals in this direction. And GE, Emerson and Schneider
are still lurking in the background.
Invensys:
After the sale of a few pieces at disappointing valuations, Invensys
is fighting debt default, a big pension short-fall, and inadequate
results from the "core" Production Management group. The company
is saddled with a CEO who knows very little about this business,
and consequently hires too many layers of ineffective management.
The latest news is that Siemens is negotiating a sale of the whole
Invensys bag. Indeed, many think that those discussions are already
on-going, while both companies tread carefully to placate the banks
and avoid lawsuits from disgruntled shareholders.
Meanwhile, guess who may be buying Appliance Controls? An Invensys
weblog reports that negotiations were already under way with other
buyerswhen they were derailed by the arrival of Allen Yurko, now
with Compass Partners. Most people are amazed that Yurko could
actually have the gall to show up like this.
It is interesting to read Yurko's bio-brief on the Compass website:
"Prior to joining Compass, Mr. Yurko was Chief Executive Officer of
Invensys (previously Siebe Plc) where he led the group's
transformation from a small engineering group to become a global
electronics and automation group, and a member of the FTSE 100."
Hmmmm.... Does Compass really expect that no one knows the dreadful
disaster that Yurko caused at Invensys? Hey, you've got to admire
his sheer guts and gall, to jump in and try again! If he pulls this
off, I'll vote for him to be knighted, or raised to the peerage:
Lord Yurko of Yurkshire!
Recovery will bring more mergers & acquisitions:
Industrial automation markets will begin to show some growth in 2004.
But, this won't really save the companies that are already on the
edge of disaster. Indeed, when recovery commences, that is a good
time for the strong to swallow the weak. Most marginal companies,
weakened by prolonged adverse conditions, will capitulate to a
reasonable price. So, looks for lots of mergers, acquisitions and
divestitures. The acquirers will expect to look like heroes -
buying cheap, and showing a quick turnaround with rising tides.
JimPinto.com Weblog Index
Invensys weblog
Rockwell weblog
Honeywell weblog
Return to the TOP
Voter rolls & electronic voting - nasty civil-rights time bomb
In 2002, with little public notice, Congress passed and the president
signed the "Help America Vote Act". Hidden behind the apple-pie-and
-motherhood name lies a nasty civil rights time-bomb. By the 2004
elections every state must emulate Florida's system of computerizing
voter files. The law empowers the secretaries of state of all 50
states to purge all these lists of suspect voters.
The new law is a radical change. Until now, with the notable exception
of Florida, voter rolls have been maintained by county officials, and
watched over by bi-partisan committees. Now the job of deciding who
can and cannot vote will fall to a single official - the 'Katherine
Harris' of each state. Remember in the 2000 Florida election, some
voters were purged by "error" for felonies committed in 2007; a big
majority of the purged voters were black.
The new law will eat up $3.9 billion of taxpayers’ money, to motivate
states and counties to adopt computerized touch-screen voting. Several
people from all walks of life have been screaming warnings about of
the treacherous potential of electronic voting. Who is listening?
Measurements already made have shown clearly that vote-count errors
are racially biased. In the presidential election of 2000, 1.9 million
ballots cast were never counted by tally machines - "spoiled" in the
language of elections officials. The spoilage rate has a distinct
racial bias: an objective study showed that it was 50% more likely
for a black vote to be "spoiled" than a white vote. In Florida, the
US Civil Rights Commission found that a black vote was nearly 10 times
as likely as a white vote to be rejected. In Florida in 2000, paper
ballots read by optical scanners in the county with the highest black
population were 25 times as likely to be rejected as those cast in the
neighboring majority-white county, using the same paper ballots but
a different automated counting system.
Does this situation sound grim to you? Most of us have become lazy
about civil rights, and would rather not think about it as still
being a problem. But the old lions of the 60's civil-rights marches
remain vigilant. The road they have traveled is long and the
sacrifices too many to let down their guard. Expect this new challenge
to be met with persistence and tenacity. Please stay involved!
Visualize a Fair Election in 2004
Wired: Mining the Vein of Voter Rolls
Return to the TOP
Editorial: Pinto's 2004 Perspectives
Permit me to express my own opinion. If you don't share my views,
please scroll to the next item, or delete. Thank you!
The financial indexes all moved upwards at the end of 2003, and the
4-years-in-a-row depression-era record has been avoided. Nasdaq has
jumped over 2,000 and & Dow over 10,000. I'd like to predict that
Nasdaq will rebound to 5,000 again, and Dow will shoot over 12,000
this year. But, those positive predictions are being made by some,
only because everyone is fed up of being pessimistic. Positive
outlooks are much more popular.
But, the world and the economy are still fragile and precarious.
Don't look for a return to "the good old days", because many things
have changed irreversibly.
After a too-close 2000 election (still disputed by many) President
GW Bush needs to win by a landslide in 2004. His presidency had barely
started when the economic boom got busted by financial scandals,
followed by the 9/11 disaster and the omni present fear of terrorism.
These events were not of his making, and one can argue that he handled
them well. But, then came the pre-emptive war in Iraq, and a half-
trillion dollars in military expenditures, while US soldiers continued
to be killed with deadly regularity long after their mission was
declared accomplished. Bush's tax cuts were supposedly for ordinary
Americans, but clearly benefit only the wealthy. Now, if a recovery
comes, Bush will claim the credit.
The Halliburton (sole-source contract, excess profits, shallow TV
image-advertising) link, plus a few foot-in-mouth fiascos, have made
Dick Cheney a liability for the 2004 ticket. So, he will probably
retire with an understandable excuse, to make room for new Veep,
carefully calculated to balance the polls.
This is election year, bruisin' for a good fight. The Democrats are
still bickering over their choice of a leader; but when the race has
been run, hopefully the ranks will close solidly behind the nominee.
I'm looking forward to a healthy discussion of all the important
issues, without someone claiming that the arguments are "traitorous".
Let the people decide!
I believe strongly that US democracy is robust, and will prevail!
Return to the TOP
Or, if you're lazy (you may miss some privileges) simply send a blank email message to :
Sign-up@JimPinto.com
with subject line :
"sign me up for JimPinto.com E-mail news".