Electronic Voting - continued concerns
Sorry, folks. I must bring this up again. This is NOT partisan politics.
This does not concern Republicans or Democrats, conservatives, or liberals,
left-wing or right-wing. It concerns ALL Americans.
As we approach Election Day 2004, serious concerns continue on the dangers
of electronic voting. How do you warn people about an approaching disaster?
People think you're a crank. If I stood on my roof-top and shouting out at
mid-night, someone would simply call the police, and I'd be carried away,
I suppose. Hey! Don't think I haven't thought of that approach too....
In recent elections, it's NOT just coincidence that the sudden rise of
inaccurate exit polls happened around the same time corporate-programmed,
computer-controlled, modem-capable voting machines began recording and
tabulating ballots. But, in any case, there's no paper trail to prove it.
In an open democracy, you would suppose that government agencies would
program, repair, and control the voting machines. You'd think the
computers that handle voting ballots would be open, and their software
and programming would be available for public scrutiny. You'd expect
there to be a paper trail of the vote, which could be tracked, counted
and audited if a there was evidence a all of voting fraud.
You'd be wrong. On all counts. After Florida's hanging chad debacle, the
commission created under the 2002 Help America Vote Act, began funneling
$3.9 billion to states to upgrade voting systems. The paperless voting
terminals which will be used by some 50 million Americans in the coming
November election are all made by several large US manufacturers.
The manufacturers all insist, of course, that the machines will work
flawlessly. But several studies have shown that serious flaws exist,
and the machines are susceptible to fraud - not just the old local-precinct
ballot-box dumping, but significant wholesale electronic hacking. And,
there will be NO way to verify the results.
After thousands of touch-screen voting machines malfunctioned during
California's March 2004 primary, Secretary of State Kevin Shelley banned
the problem machines and ordered all counties that use similar systems
to provide paper ballots as a backup.
Other similar challenges are now going on around the country. This week,
opponents of touch-screen voting machines launched a broad attack on
Maryland's system, arguing that it is riddled with flaws that must
be fixed to assure an accurate vote count in November.
In San Francisco, California, electronic voting machine manufacturer
Diebold is being sued under a whistle-blower law, alleging that the
company's shoddy balloting equipment expose California elections to
hackers and software bugs.
While many states now are balking at switching to paperless electronic
voting, about 25% of America's ballots will be cast on 100,000 paperless
voting machines in 31 states plus DC on Nov. 2. Please, please tell me
that this number has been reduced by the recent protests!
Sadly, the rhetoric surrounding the controversy immediately becomes
partisan finger-pointing.
How much more noise can anyone make before the American people sit up
and take notice? Or, will this simply be called a disaster after it
has happened? What terrorist shall we blame? So, will the Supreme
Court decide this next election too?
Here's what YOU can do:
- If you expect to vote on an electronic machine with no paper-receipt,
ask for a paper-ballot, or at least an absentee ballot.
- Visit the Verified Voting website for the latest news and updates
and campaign to demand verifiable voting results.
VerifiedVoting.org
Hindering America's Vote
Chasing down flaws in electronic voting
Johns Hopkins University - Avi Rubin E-voting Security Studies
Return to the TOP