Microsoft patents human skin as a network medium
It seems like a joke, but it isn't. Microsoft has actually been awarded
a patent to use the human body as a computer network. US Patent 6,754,472
issued to Microsoft in June 2004 is for a "method and apparatus for
transmitting power and data using the human body".
Today many carry a variety of portable electronic gadgets, each with its
own keypad, speaker, display, processor and power supply. The idea behind
the patent is to get rid of some of these items. If these gadgets were
networked, they could, for example, have just one keypad for all devices.
And that keypad might even be the body, perhaps the wrist or arm.
The patent reads, "The physical resistance offered by the human body
can be used in implementing a keypad or other input device, as well as
estimating distances between devices and device locations. With the present
invention, by varying the distance on the skin between the contacts
corresponding to different keys, different signal values can be generated
representing different inputs." So, you can type on your skin.
Microsoft also suggests using the body to generate power for the network.
A "kinetic power converter" in a person's shoe, or wristwatch, could
produce electricity in the same way that a self-winding watch extracts
energy from normal movements.
People who want to use so-called personal area network (PAN) today have
to link their mobile phones, pagers, PDAs and other gadgets using infra-red
or radio signals like Bluetooth. Microsoft's patent points out that these
have limitations - they typically use a lot of power and are prone to
interference from others operating on similar frequencies. Also, people
may be able to hack into them or listen in. Microsoft claims that its
"intrabody network" doesn't suffer from these problems, and provides
a secure transfer data between personal devices.
Actually, Microsoft is not the pioneer in this technology. The MIT Media
Lab and IBM jointly developed the idea of using the human body as a
personal network nearly a decade ago. The first prototype PAN was
demonstrated at Comdex in 1996, showing how two people could transmit
business-cards to each other via a handshake. But, little has been done
since then, since most people seem satisfied with Bluetooth PANs.
Microsoft patents human skin
Economist - The human body as a computer bus
Return to the TOP
Invensys stops company access to weblogs
The JimPinto.com Invensys weblog regularly gets about 1,000 visits per day.
This is clearly a webplace where Invensys employees seem to congregate to
discuss the status and future of their company.
The Invensys weblog is NOT intended to be negative. Indeed, a LOT of
negative comments are edited out, and many totally negative messages
are NOT weblogged. I publish only those comments which are sufficiently
rational and represent (in my own opinion) the true status of Invensys.
I have invited Invensys management (many times, up to the highest levels)
to be positive, and give their own positive views about their company.
Apart from a few exceptions, there has been no response.
Well, the JimPinto.com Invensys weblog has finally achieved the dubious
distinction of having access stopped within Invensys. One weblog on
Tuesday, August 10, 2004 complained:
"Well, I guess it has come to the point in Foxboro when it's a fact
of life what the people can and cannot read on their computer screens.
We have been informed that 'certain web sites' are not welcome on the
company computers because of the negativity. The company is going to
have a site where employees may hear the 'truth' about Invensys."
Read the complete responses by concerned employees, plus one employee's
direct challenge for CEO Rick Haythornthwaite to respond. Predictably,
Haythornthwaite has not responded.
In the meantime, Invensys shareholders gave the board a rough ride at its
annual meeting in London. The audience, largely individual shareholders
(rather than representatives of institutions) were particularly vocal
about the recent appointment of Ulf Henriksson to the new post of COO
and the size of his pay packet. When he was recruited in April, Invensys
paid Henriksson a "golden hello" worth more than £2m in cash plus shares.
Shareholders raised the question of boardroom pay repeatedly, often
provoking loud applause.
In spite of the recent BIG financing to reduce debt, Invensys stock
has been dropping - it closed at 14.75p at the end of last week
(June 13, 2004) with a market-cap of just £839m. On Monday, June 16 2004,
Invensys announced that it has commenced a tender offer for a portion of
outstanding 7-1/8% notes due 2007. Clearly it had nothing better to do
with the money it recently raised. The stock ticked up just a bit in
response this week, to 15.50p.
Stay tuned via the Invensys weblog
Invensys Announces Tender Offer for 71/8% Notes Due 2007
Return to the TOP
Marketing & Sales tips - use FABs, not FUDs
Many people confuse Marketing with Marketing Communications,
(usually called MARCOM) that is just part of the whole marketing
function.
Marketing is the entire process of finding customers and filling
their needs. It's important to have things that have been specifically
requested by customers – not just features that are cute, or nice.
Good marketers keep stressing the FABS – features, advantages, benefits.
- Features: Specifications, characteristics, size, shape, packaging, etc.
- Advantages: Improvements over alternative ways of doing the same
function.
- Benefits: In consumer markets style and fashion may be benefits. But,
in the business world there is only one central benefit – saving money.
That does not mean just product price. Benefits include features and
advantages that save money over other ways of doing the same functions.
Good marketing recognizes that features and advantages that provide no
benefits should not be included as "standard features". They might be
included as options, at additional cost; let the customer decide whether
it's an additional benefit.
Once the Marketing has been done, Sales comes into play – approaching
target customers and convincing them to buy the product over many other
choices. Good Marketing is relatively useless without Sales drive.
Marketing may identify the type of customer – Sales has to find the
customer, demonstrate the products, overcome objections and book sales.
And that's not easy – a sale is not a sale till the customer is satisfied,
pays the invoice and buys again.
Good Sales people use the FABS to sell. Not-so-good sales techniques
include negative selling – called FUDS:
- Fear: Inserting false urgency – e.g.:
"Without this product, you'll be falling behind."
"Buy now or you'll lose the discount"
- Uncertainty: Bringing up FABS that are beyond the customers knowledge
or understanding. Clouding the issues.
- Doubt: Criticizing the competitor's FABS; giving the customer negative
feelings about not buying.
Just a touch of FUDS may be in order, before losing a customer. It's fine
to show product comparisons against competitive products, but it must be
factual. Outright negative selling makes customers uncomfortable. Good
sales people should clearly understand the difference.
If you enjoy reading this kind of business advice, you might wish
to read my June 2004 article in AutomationTechies.com. It provides advice
to engineers and founders of startup companies.
I'll be doing more in this series in the next months. Stay tuned...
AutomationTechies.com - Investing in Engineering Startups
Tomorrow’s Engineer - Leadership Lessons
Return to the TOP
eFeedback
Paul Maurath [PRMaurath@netscape.net] points out that present-day hybrid
vehicles are not based on the more advanced architecture I had suggested
- totally electric drive, with the gasoline engine used primarily for
charging the batteries.
"I believe that your description of hybrids is incorrect, based on my
understanding of both the Honda and Toyota systems.
"In the Toyota system, while the electric motor drives the car by itself
at low speeds, the gasoline engine does drive the wheels directly at
higher speeds along with the electric motor. It doesn't just produce
electricity. And there is only one electric motor in the car.
"The Honda system differs in that at low speeds the gasoline engine
continues to run and the electric motor provides 'boost' for acceleration
and needed power. I'm sure you could check the websites of both companies
to be sure. They have pretty good descriptions.
"Now, I actually like your idea better. I recall reading about a hybrid
of that type in Popular Mechanics several years ago. It used a small gas
turbine engine, which could be tuned to run very efficiently at one
speed. That engine only generated electricity for the electric motor(s)
that actually drove the car. In that scenario as well, the car could be
plugged in to the grid for charging overnight too.
"Most of the time I don't drive over 50 miles a day and could use
an all-electric car. But, on those days when I need to drive more,
a hybrid like this would give me an on-board charging system which
could dramatically extend my range. If someone could build one of these,
I would buy it.
"I think you should also mention limited availability of hybrids today.
The wife of a co-worker of mine ordered a Toyota Prius last November and
has not received it yet. I checked with the dealer this weekend and they
said that the wait to buy a new Prius at this point is about one year.
Who knows how long the line will be for the Ford SUV which they are
hyping now. It is based on Toyota's technology.
"I just checked with a local Ford dealer concerning the Escape Hybrid.
Two weeks ago, I knew more than they did just by checking the web and
through the promotional CD I received from Ford directly. This major
Cincinnati Ford dealer told me they had been promised only 1 unit to sell
this year, but they would be happy to put me on their list."
Return to the TOP
Or, if you're lazy (you may miss some privileges) simply send a blank email message to :
Sign-up@JimPinto.com
with subject line :
"sign me up for JimPinto.com E-mail news".